Legacy Legal Hold Wasn't Built for Today's Complex Data Landscape

Modern legal holds must account for data spread across fragmented systems and evolving workflows. Key challenges include:

1. 1. Disparate data sources: Email, cloud storage, messaging apps, mobile devices, and legacy systems often lack unified preservation workflows.

   2. Custodian complexity: Identifying relevant custodians and tracking employee changes (e.g., role shifts, departures) creates preservation blind spots.

   3. Overlapping holds: Coordinating multiple legal holds across departments increases the chance of inconsistency and non-compliance.

   4. Disconnected tools: Siloed systems and manual processes open up security gaps and hinder defensibility.

   5. Modern file formats: Hyperlinked content (e.g., from SharePoint or Teams) often escapes traditional capture methods, risking incomplete holds.

Effective Legal Hold Notifications 

Even with sound preservation policies, many organizations face critical breakdowns in the legal hold notification process. Common challenges include:

1. Inconsistent messaging: Vague or overly legalistic language leads to confusion about obligations.

2. Manual workflows: Reliance on spreadsheets and informal follow-ups increases the risk of human error and compliance gaps.

3. Lack of visibility: Without centralized tracking, it’s difficult to confirm acknowledgment or monitor compliance in real time.

4. No escalation process: Custodians who ignore notices often slip through the cracks, risking noncompliance and potential data loss.

Without automation and standardization, organizations can't ensure timely, defensible custodian communication, putting them at risk. Technology that addresses these gaps is no longer optional.

Ensuring Custodian Compliance

Even with proper notifications in place, ensuring custodian compliance remains a major challenge. Many organizations struggle with inconsistent enforcement, lack of clear expectations, and minimal training, leading to costly mistakes.

Compliance risks escalate when:

1. Responsibilities are unclear: Custodians don’t fully understand their obligations or the scope of a legal hold.

2. Timing is off: Preservation expectations aren’t communicated clearly, or early enough to be effective.

3. Processes don’t scale: High turnover, remote teams, or complex org structures aren't accounted for in compliance workflows.

4. Follow-through is missing: There’s no system for reinforcing, monitoring, or auditing custodian behavior over time.

Without ongoing education and accountability, even the best legal hold processes can break down over time.

Inefficient Workflows 

Manual legal hold processes place a heavy burden on legal and IT teams. Without automation, teams must manage every step by hand, creating inefficiencies and compliance risks.

Key challenges include:

1. Time-consuming tasks: Tracking acknowledgments, issuing reminders, and updating hold status manually take significant time.

2. Fragmented systems: Managing data preservation across siloed platforms increases complexity and the chance of oversight.

3. Administrative overload: Skilled professionals are stuck performing repetitive, low-value work instead of focusing on higher-level legal strategy.

4. Increased risk of error: Manual processes are prone to mistakes that can compromise defensibility and slow legal response times.

5. Unsustainable at scale: As legal hold volume grows, resource strain escalates, impacting compliance and operational efficiency.

Improperly Preserved Data 

Poorly managed legal holds don’t just create inefficiencies, they expose organizations to significant legal, financial, and operational risks.

Common issues include:

1. Over- or under-collection: Collecting too much data inflates storage costs; collecting too little increases the risk of non-compliance.

2. Balancing preservation with privacy: As regulations tighten, organizations must preserve data without violating privacy or security requirements.

3. Data integrity risks: Inadequate processes can result in altered, corrupted, or lost data, undermining defensibility.

4. Incomplete audit trails: Gaps in documentation make it difficult to prove compliance during audits or litigation.

5. Legal and regulatory exposure: Failures in preservation can lead to sanctions, fines, or adverse legal outcomes.

How to Implement Proactive Legal Hold Management

To establish defensible preservation processes, organizations should implement the following best practices to address the most common challenges in litigation hold management. 

Adopt a Proactive Information Governance Strategy

Implement proactive information governance by regularly purging outdated data to reduce eDiscovery burdens. During a legal hold, suspend any conflicting automated deletions and coordinate with IT and records teams for compliance. Once the matter is resolved, formally release the hold, document the conclusion, and resume normal data retention practices.

Centralize & Standardize the Legal Hold Process

Establish a centralized and well-documented legal hold process as part of your overall compliance strategy. Define roles, communication methods, and compliance monitoring clearly. Use legal hold software to automate, track, and scale the process, ensuring consistency, efficiency, and defensibility across the organization.

Leverage Modern Data Management and Preservation Tools

Utilizing automated legal hold software and data mapping tools can enhance efficiency and defensibility in the legal hold process.

Track, Monitor & Document Legal Hold Compliance

Track and document legal hold compliance using automated tools to reduce errors and improve efficiency. Require custodians to acknowledge holds, send regular reminders, and maintain detailed audit trails. Monitor compliance actively and address any issues to ensure defensibility.

Keep Detailed, Auditable Records of All Legal Hold Actions

Maintain thorough documentation of all legal hold actions, including issuance, acknowledgments, follow-ups, and enforcement. A detailed audit trail is essential for demonstrating compliance and defending against legal challenges.

Our Solutions

Cloudficient's integrated legal hold technology addresses the challenges with two complementary solutions that transform manual, error-prone processes into automated, defensible workflows.

CaseFusion - A comprehensive eDiscovery platform that unifies custodian identification, automated hold notifications with escalation workflows, real-time compliance dashboards, and defensible audit trails. Organizations gain centralized legal hold management across enterprise data ecosystems with proactive alerts, automated reminders, and comprehensive documentation that satisfies court expectations.

Expireon - A cloud-native data archiving platform designed to fill gaps in governance tools like Microsoft Purview. Expireon provides a defensible, compliant home for email, messaging platforms, and file systems with custom retention periods, native format storage, and cost-effective pricing based on data volume rather than user licenses.

Together, these solutions ensure impeccable compliance while mitigating risk and simplifying complexity across your organization's legal hold processes.

Related Resources