Using Data Mapping to Break Down Information Silos

Traditional discovery methods struggle with the complex webs of information that Enterprises use to create and house data. Organizations typically lack visibility into where data resides, and who controls access to it, risking:

1. 1. Departmental isolation: Business units operating independent systems without cross-functional data mapping, making comprehensive data discovery nearly impossible during litigation.

   2. Legacy system complexity: Outdated databases and file servers containing crucial historical data, that are disconnected from data mapping initiatives.

   3. Cloud platform proliferation: The adoption of SaaS applications often results in data repositories that fall outside traditional IT oversight and established data identification processes.

   4. Geographic distribution: Global organizations struggle to map data across international boundaries where local regulations and systems complicate unified data discovery.

These fragmented environments force legal teams to rely on incomplete data identification, potentially missing critical evidence and compromising case outcomes.

Data Discovery & Case Mapping Complexity

Traditional data discovery approaches fail when confronted with the complexity of modern enterprises. Interconnected systems and diverse data formats require sophisticated mapping strategies. Organizations struggle to create comprehensive inventories that accurately reflect their data landscape and incorporate:

1. Multi-platform integration: Data mapping needs to account for interactions not just within, but between email systems, collaboration platforms, databases, and file repositories that traditional tools cannot access.

2. Dynamic data relationships:  Hyperlinked content and cross-platform references create dependencies that standard data identification methods frequently overlook.

3. Version control challenges: Documents exist in multiple versions across various platforms, requiring advanced data mapping to maintain accuracy and completeness.

4. Real-time data evolution: Active business operations continuously generate new data relationships that static mapping approaches do not accommodate.

Without robust data mapping capabilities, organizations face extended discovery timelines and inflated costs from over-collection and processing inefficiencies.

Data Custodian & Data Steward Access Challenges

Identifying and engaging the right custodians represents one of the most complex aspects of foundational eDiscovery, especially when custodian relationships and data stewardship responsibilities are obscured by information silos. Organizations often lack clear documentation of:

1. Role ambiguity: Employees often serve multiple functions across departments, making it difficult to identify all relevant custodians for specific data sets when litigation begins.

2. Organizational changes: Leavers, restructuring, and role transitions create gaps in custodian identification that can compromise data preservation efforts.

3. Permission complexities: Layered access controls across multiple platforms obscure who has access to critical repositories.

4. Stewardship confusion: It can be difficult to distinguish between data custodians using the data, and data stewards who manage system access and retention policies.

These access challenges delay case initiation and increase the risk of incomplete data preservation, potentially exposing organizations to spoliation claims.

Database Identification & eDiscovery Forensics Complexity 

Enterprise databases contain huge amounts of structured data that require specialized identification and case mapping approaches that go beyond traditional file and custodian-based methods. Organizations struggle to identify relevant database content without comprehensive data mapping that documents system relationships and data flows due to:

1. Structured data challenges: Identifying document relationships requires sophisticated queries and data identification methods that traditional eDiscovery tools cannot accommodate.

2. System integration mapping: Enterprise systems share data through APIs and integration points that need to be documented to ensure complete identification.

3. Forensic preservation requirements: Database evidence requires specialized collection methods that maintain data integrity while supporting forensic analysis.

4. Access log complexity: Database activity logs contain critical evidence but require advanced data mapping to identify relevant entries and relationships.

These database identification challenges extend discovery timelines and require specialized expertise that many tools lack.

Data Culling & Digital Evidence Processing

Effective data culling depends on accurate data identification and mapping to ensure relevant information is preserved while eliminating unnecessary data that inflates processing costs. Organizations without a comprehensive data mapping solution face significant challenges in making informed decisions, such as:

1. Relevance determination: Data culling requires a deep understanding of the relationships between data and business content that can't be provided by incomplete data mapping.

2. Processing efficiency: Poor data identification leads to over-collection that dramatically increases processing costs and delays timelines.

3. Quality control gaps: Without proper data mapping, organizations struggle to verify that culling decisions have preserved all relevant evidence.

4. Defensibility concerns: Inadequate documentation of data identification and culling processes can expose organizations to concerns over discovery completeness.

Organizations that implement strategic data mapping achieve significant cost savings through more precise culling and reduced processing volumes.

Breaking Down Information Silos & Enabling Unified Data Discovery

To achieve comprehensive custodian mapping and data identification, organizations should implement the following best practices to break down information silos and establish unified data discovery processes.

Establish Comprehensive Data Mapping & Data Lineage Documentation

Create detailed inventories that document data sources, custodian relationships, and system interdependences across your entire enterprise. Implement automated discovery tools that continuously scan systems to identify new repositories and update existing data maps. Perform regular audits to verify mapping accuracy and identify gaps that could compromise future eDiscovery efforts. 

Implement Automated Data Custodian & Data Steward Tracking

Deploy integrated systems that track employee roles, system access, and data relationships in real-time. Automated tracking should monitor role changes, department transfers, and access reconfigurations that affect certain data sets. Organizations with robust tracking systems respond faster to litigation holds and maintain better compliance throughout the discovery process. 

Optimize Data Deduplication & Data Culling Processes

Leverage AI-powered classification tools to analyse content for context, metadata, and system relationships which help make informed culling decisions. Implement deduplication processes that account for file versions, platform-specific formatting, and hyperlinked content relationships that traditional tools often miss. Organizations that optimize culling processes achieve significant cost savings while maintaining strongly defensible discovery processes. 

Leverage Technology for Scalable Data Discovery & Database Identification 

Deploy advanced data discovery tools that can access structured databases, cloud platforms, and legacy systems through standardized APIs and integration points. Technology platforms should provide real-time visibility into data mapping status and custodian tracking across all enterprise systems. Organizations that leverage complete technology solutions achieve faster case initiation and more complete data identification while reducing manual effort and human error.

Preserve Hyperlinked Content Relationships & Version Control

Collection tools that can capture hyperlinked content at the reference level, preserving relationships between documents stored across different platforms and systems must be implemented. Establish version control procedures that identify the most current document versions while maintaining historical copies that can contain relevant information. Organizations need to properly address hyperlinked content challenges so they can produce more complete evidence and avoid discovery disputes about missing information.

Implement AI-Powered Data Classification During Identification 

Deploy machine learning algorithms that analyse content context, communication patterns, and data relationships to identify potentially relevant information early in the EDRM process. It is necessary to create validation workflows that verify AI’s classification decisions while maintaining the efficiency gained from automated processes. Organizations that effectively leverage AI during data identification achieve significant cost reductions while improving discovery completeness and accuracy.

Our Solutions

Cloudficient’s data identification and custodian mapping solutions transform complex enterprise data challenges into manageable, defensible processes that reduce costs and improve case outcomes. 

CaseFusion - Unifies identification, custodian mapping, and data discovery through integrated workflows that connect HR systems, IT infrastructure, and legal operations for comprehensive data visibility and automated custodian tracking. 

Expireon - Provides comprehensive data archiving with hyperlinked file intelligence that preserves document relationships and maintains complete context for more effective data identification and mapping across enterprise systems.

Expireon AI Studio - Enhances identification through AI-powered classification and categorization that intelligently analyses content, identifies key custodians, and reduces manual review requirements while maintaining discovery defensibility.

Related Resources