<img alt="" src="https://www.operation-inspirationastute.com/809425.png" style="display:none;">

You Don't Just Acquire a Company.
You Acquire Their Past.

 
Mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures don’t just transfer systems; they transfer responsibility. From day one, you are accountable for data you didn’t create, stored in systems you didn’t choose, governed by obligations you didn’t define. Cloudficient helps organizations take defensible control of inherited communication and collaboration data, without disrupting legal holds, breaking chain of custody, or relying on aging legacy platforms.  
 

How Cloudficient Helps

1

BECOME A RESPONSIBLE STEWARD OF ACQUIRED DATA

Cloudficient helps organizations understand what data has been inherited and where it resides, which systems and custodians are in scope, and where legal, regulatory, and business risk exists. 

Result: Clear scope, defensible accountability, and informed decision-making before irreversible migration or legal actions occur.

Learn more

2

ARCHIVE WHAT MICROSOFT 365 CANNOT HANDLE

Cloudficient provides a compliant home for inherited data that cannot safely live in Microsoft 365 without forcing organizations to maintain fragile legacy systems. 

Result: Confident legacy retirement with uninterrupted compliance.

Learn more

 

3

AI-DRIVEN DATA CLASSIFICATION FOR M&A

Cloudficient uses AI-driven classification, which distinguishes high-value, defensible content to be kept, from content that can be safely excluded before migration. 

Result: Lower migration costs, reduced data volume, and the ability to make smarter, defensible decisions throughout M&A integration.

Learn more

4

PRESERVE THE CONTEXT BEHIND INHERITED DATA

Cloudficient preserves historical identity intelligence across systems, ensuring that custodianship and chain of custody remain intact long after source systems are gone. 

Result: Accurate discovery, defensible collections, and no blind spots in custodian history.

Learn more

Related Resources

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens to data during a merger or acquisition?

During M&A transactions, organizations inherit scattered data which often is missing context and has unclear ownership. This data is often sequestered in isolated email archives, collaboration platforms, legacy systems, and documents that are under legal hold. Without knowing what is contained in this data, you are also inheriting a compliance risk that prevents legacy system retirement and makes maintaining chain of custody difficult. 

How do you maintain legal holds during data migration?

Legal holds must remain uninterrupted during M&A integration to avoid spoliation risks. To remain compliant, custodian context must be preserved throughout migration by maintaining immutable archives for data that won’t work in your new environment, and implementing legal-hold-aware systems that track who created what content and when, This ensures the chain of custody remains intact while data moves from acquired systems into your infrastructure.  

What is ROT data and why does it matter in M&A?

ROT stands for Redundant, Obsolete, and Trivial data; It is information that no longer serves a purpose for business, legal, or compliance. In M&A scenarios, inherited systems are often over 50% ROT which increases storage costs, migration complexity, and eDiscovery expenses. AI-powered classification tools like AI Studio can automatically identify ROT before migration, allowing organizations to reduce data volume and only migrate what truly matters. 

Can you retire legacy systems after an acquisition?

Legacy systems can be retired once critical data has been responsibly migrated to compliant storage. This requires first gaining visibility into what data exists, classifying valuable content versus ROT, migrating important records while preserving metadata and custodian context, and ensuring data under legal hold has a compliant home. Only after these steps can legacy archives be safely decommissioned. 

How is handling data different in divestitures versus acquisitions?

Divestitures and acquisitions present opposite data challenges. In acquisitions, you’re inheriting unknown data where you have to gain visibility into it, identify what is valuable, and integrate it without disrupting legal holds. In divestitures, you already own the data. The challenge is cleanly separating it while ensuring each party only gets what separation agreements allow and creating defensible copies that preserve context while preventing unauthorized retention. Acquisitions require consolidation and deduplication; divestitures require division and access control. Both require maintaining chain of custody for compliance, but acquisitions focus on “what did we get?” while divestitures focus on “who gets what?"